JAAOS - 2026-03-15 - Journal Article
Periprosthetic Femur Fractures in Hemiarthroplasty Correlated With Stem Type: An Analysis From the American Joint Replacement Registry.
DeRogatis MJ, Zaniletti I, Chen AF, Gomez RW, Issack PS, Lundy DW
Topics
Key Takeaway
Cemented composite beam stems carry a 3.4–3.6x lower periprosthetic femur fracture hazard compared to cementless tapered wedge or fit-and-fill stems in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in patients ≥70 years.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This study used AJRR data (2012–2021) to evaluate whether femoral stem geometry and collar presence affect periprosthetic femur fracture (PPF) risk in patients ≥70 undergoing hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. After inverse probability weighting, collarless tapered wedge stems (HR 3.63), collarless fit-and-fill (HR 3.40), and collared fit-and-fill (HR 3.45) all demonstrated markedly higher PPF risk versus cemented composite beam stems. Collar presence reduced PPF risk across all cementless designs, with the largest absolute reduction in tapered wedge stems (0.90% collarless vs. 0.41% collared).
Key Limitation
Registry data lack bone mineral density, fracture classification (Garden type), and surgeon volume, preventing adjustment for patient-level bone quality and case complexity that likely influence both implant selection and PPF risk.
Original Abstract
BACKGROUND
Periprosthetic femur fractures are a known complication after hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) in geriatric patients. The relationship between femoral stem design and fracture risk remains unclear. This study aimed to assess (1) the association between stem geometry and fixation on periprosthetic femur fracture risk and (2) the effect of a femoral stem collar.
METHODS
The American Joint Replacement Registry data were analyzed for HA cases in patients aged 70+ years from 2012 to 2021. We identified 56,828 primary HAs for the diagnosis of femoral neck fracture. Patient demographics and revision surgery for periprosthetic femur fracture in the form of open reduction with internal fixation or revision arthroplasty were documented. Stems were categorized into tapered wedge or fit and fill, and cemented stems were categorized into composite beam or taper slip. Cox models and Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Cemented composite beam stems accounted for 38% of implants, followed by fit-and-fill stems at 32%, tapered wedge stems at 29%, and cemented taper slip stems at 1%. A collar was present in all cemented composite beam stems, 23% of tapered wedge stems, and 20% of fit-and-fill stems. After applying inverse probability weighting adjustment, cemented composite beam stems showed a markedly lower periprosthetic femur fracture risk over other stems. Compared with cemented composite beam stems, collarless tapered wedge demonstrated a markedly higher hazard ratio (HR) (3.63; P < 0.001), as did both collarless (HR, 3.4; P < 0.001) and collared fit-and-fill stems (HR, 3.45; P < 0.001). The presence of a collar reduced periprosthetic femur fracture risk across all designs, with the most pronounced reduction seen in tapered wedge stems (0.90% versus 0.41%).
CONCLUSION
For HA in patients aged 70 years and older, cemented composite beam stems with a collar were associated with the lowest risk of periprosthetic femur fractures in the American Joint Replacement Registry database. However, these findings reflect implant utilization patterns up to 2021 and may not fully account for the recent rise in triple taper collared stem use. Surgeons should consider these implants when selecting fixation strategies for HA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III.