<- Back to digest

Arthroscopy - 2026-03-14 - Journal Article

Hip Arthroscopy Yields Favorable Outcome, Return-to-Sport Rate, and 5-Year Survivorship in Athletic Population With Generalized Ligamentous Laxity in the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears.

Quesada-Jimenez R, Shah PP, Strok MJ, Becker N, Kahana-Rojkind AH, Domb BG

retrospective cohortLOE IVn = 232 hips (116 GLL, 116 matched controls)Minimum 5 years (78.7% follow-up rate in GLL group)

Topics

arthroplastyshoulder elbowsports
PMID: 41830496DOI: 10.1002/arj.70078View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

Hip arthroscopy in athletes with generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton ≥4) yields 83% return-to-sport and mHHS improvement from 66.1 to 86.7 at minimum 5-year follow-up, with no significant difference in outcomes versus non-lax controls.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This study asked whether GLL (Beighton ≥4) adversely affects outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tears in athletes. Retrospective matched-cohort analysis compared PROs, RTS, and survivorship between GLL and non-lax (Beighton <3) patients at minimum 5-year follow-up. GLL patients achieved significant improvement across all five PRO measures and showed no statistically significant difference from controls in postoperative scores, MCID achievement, RTS (83%), sport continuation at 5 years (74.6%), or survivorship.

Key Limitation

The 21.3% loss to follow-up in the GLL group, if non-random (i.e., failures or poor outcomes disproportionately lost), could meaningfully inflate reported success rates.

Original Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the minimum 5-year clinical outcomes and return-to-sport (RTS) rates of patients with generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL) who underwent hip arthroscopy with a secondary comparison to a benchmark control group with no GLL.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with GLL (Beighton score ≥ 4) who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between November 2009 and January 2019. We included patients who reported preoperative sport participation and had preoperative and minimum 5-year follow-up for at least one patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), or Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to arthroplasty was accounted for. Patients with GLL were matched to patients with a Beighton score of <3. Rates of meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), RTS, and having secondary surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-two hips were included, with 116 hips in the GLL group (age: 27.3 years,

BMI

23.7 kg/m 2 ) (78.7% follow-up) and 116 in the control group (age: 28.4 years,

BMI

23.6 kg/m 2 ). Patients in the GLL group showed significant improvement in all evaluated PROs (mHHS: 66.1-86.7,

NAHS

67.6-87.0, iHOT-12: 40.1-78.2,

HOS-SSS

45.0-79.7,

VAS

4.9-2.1; P < .01). MCID was met at similarly high rates for both groups (P > .05). Patients with GLL reported a RTS rate of 83% at any time point postoperative, and 74.6% of those that returned were able to continue playing at the 5-year mark. No differences in postoperative PRO scores, RTS, continuation-of-sport participation, and survivorship were found between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip arthroscopy in patients with GLL yields favorable outcomes and survivorship at 5-year minimum follow-up comparable to patients without GLL. A high percentage of athletes with GLL were able to RTS and continue playing 5 years after hip arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective comparative case series.