JOA - 2026-04-15 - Journal Article
Non-Articulating Spacers Increase the Risk of Patella Baja in the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Knee.
Deckey DG, Thompson AB, Austin R, Richards AE, Yee CI, Tarabichi S, Ledford CK, Spangehl MJ, Clarke HD, Abdel MP, Bingham JS
Topics
Key Takeaway
Non-articulating spacers carry an 8.9-fold higher odds of true patella baja versus articulating spacers during two-stage revision for chronic knee PJI, with patella baja associated with 23° less knee flexion at final follow-up.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This study asked whether spacer type influences the incidence of true patella baja in two-stage revision TKA for chronic PJI, comparing 97 non-articulating to 82 articulating spacers using modified Insall-Salvati and Blackburn-Peel ratios. Patella baja occurred in 11/97 non-articulating versus 2/82 articulating spacer patients (P=0.02), with multivariable logistic regression confirming OR=8.9 (P=0.04) for non-articulating spacers after adjusting for age, sex, ASA score, augments, cones/sleeves, and preoperative arc of motion. Revision rates for infection and any cause did not differ between groups, but patella baja patients had significantly worse final flexion (82° vs. 105°, P=0.01).
Key Limitation
The retrospective, single-institution design with surgeon-directed spacer selection introduces unmeasured confounding, as patients receiving non-articulating spacers likely had more severe soft-tissue compromise or bone loss that independently predisposes to extensor mechanism shortening.
Original Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Patellar baja is a known complication following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Static, or non-articulating, spacers for TKA periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can result in shortening of the extensor mechanism, though no comparison to articulating spacers has been performed. This study aimed to evaluate the association between spacer type and the incidence of true patellar baja.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 179 patients who underwent two-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic knee PJI (97 non-articulating and 82 articulating spacers). The primary outcome was the development of patellar baja measured via modified Insall-Salvati and Blackburn-Peel ratios. A binary logistic regression model was used to assess the association between spacer type and patellar baja, adjusting for potential confounders including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of augments, cones/sleeves, and preoperative arc of motion. Cumulative incidence functions were used to compare the risk of revision surgery (for infection and for any cause) between spacer types, treating death as a competing risk.
RESULTS
Patellar baja occurred in 13 (7%) patients. Patients receiving non-articulating spacers were significantly more likely to develop true patellar baja compared to those receiving an articulating spacer (11 of 97 versus two of 82, respectively, P = 0.02). In the multivariable analysis, non-articulating spacers remained significantly associated with higher odds of true patellar baja (odds ratio (OR) = 8.9, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of revision for infection (P = 0.98) or any cause (P = 0.25). Patients who developed patellar baja also had significantly reduced knee flexion at final follow-up compared to those who did not (mean 82 versus 105°, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Non-articulating spacers used during two-stage revision arthroplasty were associated with an increased risk of patellar baja compared with articulating spacers, and the development of patellar baja was associated with worse postoperative knee flexion. When clinically feasible, articulating spacers may help preserve extensor mechanism function and optimize postoperative knee motion.