Spine - 2026-04-21 - Journal Article
Preoperative Neurological Severity and Clinically Meaningful Recovery After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Multicenter Study of 1,024 Patients.
Hirai T, Onuma H, Sakai K, Hashimoto M, Horiuchi A, Inose H, Yamada K, Matsukura Y, Morishita S, Egawa S, Hashimoto J, Sakaeda K, Tamura S, Komiya Y, Torigoe I, Tomori M, Sakaki K, Otani K, Kusano K, Yamada T, Ushio S, Shindo S, Arai Y, Yoshii T
Topics
Key Takeaway
Severe DCM patients (preoperative JOA <10) achieved severity-adjusted MCID (≥3-point improvement) in 66.9% of cases after ACDF, significantly exceeding the 49.0% MCID rate in mild-moderate patients.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This multicenter retrospective study stratified 1,024 ACDF/ACCF patients into severe (JOA <10, n=320) and mild-moderate (JOA ≥10, n=704) groups to determine whether preoperative severity predicts severity-adjusted MCID achievement. Both groups improved significantly at 1 year (severe: 7.4→11.7; mild-moderate: 12.4→14.6), with equivalent recovery rates (~44–48%). Severe patients achieved MCID more frequently (66.9% vs. 49.0%, P<0.001), but excellent recovery (JOA recovery rate ≥80%) was less common in the severe group (12.5% vs. 23.4%, P<0.01).
Key Limitation
One-year follow-up is insufficient to determine whether initial neurological gains are durable or whether severe-group patients experience higher rates of late deterioration or reoperation.
Original Abstract
STUDY DESIGN
Multicenter retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE
To determine how preoperative neurological severity influences postoperative recovery and achievement of clinically meaningful improvement following anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF/ACCF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Anterior cervical decompression procedures are widely used for DCM, including ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, with favorable outcomes reported over decades. However, the impact of preoperative neurological severity on recovery after anterior surgery remains insufficiently defined. Large anterior-only cohorts evaluating severity-adjusted minimal clinically important difference (MCID) are lacking.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed 1,024 patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion at three spine centers between 2011 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative JOA score into a severe group (JOA <10; n=320) and a mild-moderate group (JOA ≥10; n=704). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, and severity-specific MCID thresholds (≥3-point improvement for severe and ≥2-point improvement for mild-moderate myelopathy). Perioperative complications, including dysphagia, segmental motor deficit, and graft-related events, were recorded.
RESULTS
Preoperative JOA scores were significantly lower in the severe group (7.4 ± 2.2) than in the mild-moderate group (12.4 ± 1.6; P<0.001). Both groups showed substantial improvement at 1 year (11.7 ± 3.1 vs. 14.6 ± 1.8; P<0.001). Recovery rates were similar (44.6% vs. 48.2%; P=0.74). MCID achievement was significantly higher in the severe group (66.9%) than in the mild-moderate group (49.0%; P<0.001). Excellent recovery (JOA recovery rate ≥80%) was more frequent in the mild-moderate group (23.4% vs. 12.5%; P<0.01). Complication rates did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSION
In this large multicenter cohort, patients with severe preoperative myelopathy achieved meaningful neurological improvement and high rates of severity-adjusted MCID after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. These findings provide practical, severity-based prognostic information for preoperative counseling in DCM surgery.