Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics - 2026-01-01 - Journal Article; Multicenter Study
Spinal Anesthesia: A Safe and Effective Alternative to General Anesthesia for Infantile DDH Surgery.
Gornitzky AL, Holman AE, Hall C, William M, Sankar WN, Zaltz I
Topics
Key Takeaway
Spinal anesthesia completed 23 DDH reduction procedures in infants (mean age 6.4 months) with zero anesthetic or surgical complications and 100% concentric reduction maintained at cast removal.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This multicenter retrospective pilot evaluated spinal anesthesia (SA) as an alternative to general anesthesia for closed and open DDH reductions in infants ≤18 months. SA was successfully established in all 23 procedures (mean 1.4 needle attempts, 17-minute setup); 74% required supplemental IV sedation (76% dexmedetomidine), none required intubation. No anesthetic or surgical complications occurred, and all reduced hips remained concentrically reduced at cast removal.
Key Limitation
With only 16 patients and no comparator group, the study is underpowered to detect rare but serious complications and cannot quantify any advantage over general anesthesia.
Original Abstract
BACKGROUND
Operative hip reductions for infantile DDH are traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA). This introduces potential safety concerns, as risks related to GA are highest in children below 1 year. While surgery can be temporarily delayed to reduce these risks, this decreases the chances of a successful reduction via closed methods alone and also compromises valuable remodeling potential. This pilot study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia (SA) in infants undergoing operative hip reduction.
METHODS
This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of all infants 18 months or younger undergoing closed or open reductions for infantile DDH. SA was performed according to the institutional protocol previously developed for infants undergoing urologic procedures (>1200 procedures performed safely to date). A retrospective chart review was completed for demographic characteristics, treatment history, clinical exam, anesthetic course, and operative details.
RESULTS
A total of 16 index reductions were performed under SA, including 9 closed reductions and 7 open reductions (including 1 staged anterior open reduction). The mean age at first procedure was 6.4 months. Seven patients underwent a planned spica cast exchange under SA as well. In total, 23 procedures were performed under SA. The mean number of attempts at spinal was 1.4, and the mean SA setup time was 17 minutes. Following SA, most babies slept through the procedure without issue (including open reduction). Most babies (17/23, 74%) required additional IV sedation [13/17 (76% dexmedetomidine only)]. None required endotracheal intubation. There were no surgical or anesthetic complications. All treated hips remained concentrically reduced at the time of spica cast removal.
CONCLUSIONS
SA is a safe and effective anesthetic for infant hip reductions. This proof-of-concept pilot study highlights a technical advance with the potential to change how (and when) pediatric orthopaedists treat infantile DDH. In addition to eliminating the risks of GA, SA may allow earlier surgery, which could improve acetabular remodeling and decrease the need for subsequent pelvic osteotomy.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV-case series.