JOA - 2026-05-21 - Journal Article
Do Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Heads Have Reduced Revision Risk Compared to Stainless-Steel Metal Heads with a Single Cemented Femoral Design? A New Zealand Joint-Registry Study.
Ng JS, Bolam SM, Frampton CMA, Pitto RP
Topics
Key Takeaway
LFIT cobalt-chromium and stainless-steel femoral heads yield equivalent 10-year revision-free survival (96.3% vs 96.5%, HR 1.17, p=0.32) when used with a polished tapered SS stem and XLPE liner.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This New Zealand Joint Registry study compared revision-free survivorship and Oxford Hip Scores between LFIT cobalt-chromium (13.1%) and stainless-steel (86.9%) femoral heads used with a single polished tapered SS cemented stem and cementless XLPE-lined cup in 11,040 primary THAs for OA. Adjusted Cox regression showed no significant difference in revision risk (HR 1.17, p=0.32), with 10-year survival of 96.3% vs 96.5% respectively. Revision rates for trunnionosis and osteolysis did not differ, and OHS scores were equivalent at 6 months, 5 years, and 10 years.
Key Limitation
The 86.9% SS vs 13.1% LFIT allocation reflects surgeon preference rather than randomization, and unmeasured confounders (patient activity level, head size distribution, surgeon volume) may have influenced head selection and revision outcomes.
Original Abstract
BACKGROUND
In primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), a stainless-steel (SS) femoral stem can often be implanted with either low-friction ion-treated (LFIT) cobalt-chromium or SS metallic heads. An LFIT head is sometimes favored for its higher Young's modulus and lower friction, thought to reduce wear. However, combining different metals (i.e., an LFIT head with an SS alloy stem) may increase corrosion or fretting at the head-neck junction. Furthermore, LFIT heads are more expensive in some markets. This registry-based study aimed to compare survivorship and reason(s) for revision between SS femoral stems implanted using SS or LFIT heads.
METHODS
Using New Zealand Joint Registry data (between 1999 and 2022), we identified 11,040 primary THAs indicated for osteoarthritis using a SS polish tapered stem and highly porous titanium cementless cup combination with a highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) liner and a metallic head. The groups were subdivided into LFIT (13.1%) and SS (86.9%) heads. Revision-free implant survivorship and functional outcomes (Oxford Hip Scores [OHS]) were compared using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS
Revision-free implant survival at 10 years was 96.3% for LFIT and 96.5% for SS heads. Compared with SS, the adjusted risk of revision for LFIT was not significantly different (hazard ratio = 1.17, P = 0.32). The most common indications for revision in both groups were dislocation and then deep infection. There was no difference in revision rates for trunnionosis. Mean OHS scores were similar between groups at six months, five years, and 10 years.
CONCLUSION
Overall, survivorship outcomes were similar between LFIT and SS metallic femoral heads, and revision rates for osteolysis did not differ between groups. However, given the potential risk of taper junction tribocorrosion, surgeons should consider using an SS head when using a hybrid THA with an XLPE liner.