<- Back to digest

JOA - 2026-05-20 - Journal Article

Concordance of Dislocation Direction and Surgical Approach is an Approach-Dependent Risk for Recurrent Instability Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Ruderman LV, Jing C, Deckey DG, Bolognesi MP, Ryan SP, Schwartz AM

retrospective cohortLOE IIIn = 114 hips (112 patients)N/A if not reported.

Topics

arthroplastytrauma
PMID: 42167461DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2026.05.034View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

After posterior-approach THA, posterior dislocation recurs in 68.4% of cases versus 28.6% for anterior dislocation (P=0.006), while concordance direction has no predictive value after anterior-approach THA (42.3% vs 41.2%, P=0.94).

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This study examined whether concordance between dislocation direction and surgical approach predicts recurrent instability in 114 hips that dislocated after primary THA. Posterior-approach hips with posterior dislocation recurred at 68.4% versus 28.6% for discordant anterior dislocation (P=0.006); anterior-approach hips showed no significant difference by dislocation direction (P=0.94). Overall, 56.0% of patients not revised after index dislocation sustained at least one recurrence, with median time to second dislocation of 97 days.

Key Limitation

Absence of component positioning data (cup abduction and anteversion) prevents determination of whether concordant recurrence reflects soft-tissue failure, implant malposition, or both, limiting mechanistic and actionable conclusions.

Original Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hip instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA), while uncommon, is a leading cause for revision. The purpose of the study was to quantify the risk of recurrent hip dislocation in relation to concordance of dislocation directionality and surgical approach.

METHODS

Included patients underwent anterior-based or posterior-based elective primary THA and sustained at least one dislocation treated at a single institution. Surgical approach, timing, direction, and management of dislocations, including closed reduction and reoperation, were obtained. Concordance was defined as dislocation in the same direction as the surgical approach. There were 112 patients (114 hips) who experienced dislocation after primary THA between January 1, 2013, and November 1, 2025. Chi-square analyses were performed to assess differences in dislocation recurrence, depending upon approach and dislocation directionality.

RESULTS

The posterior approach was most common (62.3%), followed by anterior (27.2%) and direct lateral (10.5%). The median time to first dislocation was 41 days [interquartile range (IQR) 18, 103.5], and most were posteriorly dislocated (64.9%). There were five patients (4.4%) who required an open reduction and revision after index dislocation. There were 61 patients who experienced at least two dislocations, accounting for 56.0% of patients who were not revised at the initial dislocation. The median time to second dislocation was 97 days [IQR 46, 375]. For posterior approaches, 68.4% of posterior dislocations recurred, while just 28.6% of anterior dislocations recurred (P = 0.006). For anterior approaches, 42.3% of posterior dislocations and 41.2% of anterior dislocations recurred (P = 0.94).

CONCLUSION

Concordance between approach and dislocation directionality is a helpful predictor of recurrence for posterior-based approaches. Recurrent instability occurs in more than half of patients after a single dislocation; thus, indications for revision should be closely scrutinized after an instability event.