JSES - 2026-06-04 - Journal Article
Operative Timing Predicts Postoperative Complications after Staged Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Wier J, Mayfield CK, Mouchawar AC, Barcenas AB, Weber AE, Gamradt SC, Petrigliano FA
Topics
Key Takeaway
Staged bilateral rTSA performed within 12 months of the index procedure carries 1.8–2.4× greater odds of 90-day surgical complications versus unilateral rTSA, with a calculated risk-attenuation threshold of 390 days.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This retrospective database study used the Premier Healthcare Database (2016–2020) to determine whether interprocedural interval in staged bilateral rTSA predicts 90-day surgical complications. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, staged rTSA at <6 months and 6–12 months carried adjusted odds ratios of 2.4 (95% CI 1.6–3.6) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.2–4.8) for composite complications versus unilateral rTSA, driven primarily by fracture and infection. Staging beyond 12 months (Metropolis-Hastings changepoint: 390 days) eliminated the excess risk.
Key Limitation
The 90-day observation window captures only early complications and cannot determine whether the elevated risk in short-interval staging reflects physiologic deconditioning, systemic immunosuppression, or rehabilitation interference—precluding mechanistic conclusions.
Original Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The optimal timing between staged bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is unknown. Here we sought to identify the association between interprocedural time and risk of surgical complications.
METHODS
The Premier Healthcare Database was retrospectively queried for patients in the United States undergoing primary rTSA between 2016-2020 and divided into those who underwent staged bilateral surgery and those who underwent unilateral surgery. These patients were propensity score matched 1:3 and staged patients were further split into <6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months intervals. The primary outcome assessed was a composite of 90-day surgical complications. Multivariable models were generated to evaluate the association between surgical timing and outcomes to account for residual confounding. In a subanalysis treating the interprocedural interval as a continuous variable, the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm was used to identify a changepoint time interval beyond which complication risk attenuates.
RESULTS
3,152 staged rTSAs were matched to 9,456 unilateral rTSAs. After adjusting for confounding, patients who underwent staged rTSA at <6 or 6-12 months after their first rTSA experienced 2.4 (95%-confidence interval [CI]:1.6-3.6) and 1.8 (95%-CI:1.2-4.8) greater adjusted odds of composite surgical complications, respectively, when compared to unilateral rTSA. No significant differences were observed between the unilateral cohort and those staged >12 months. This difference in complications was largely driven by increased risk of fracture and infection. On evaluation of the relationship between time from first rTSA to second and odds of composite surgical complications, an approximated interval threshold of 390 days was determined, beyond which surgical risk becomes non-significant.
CONCLUSION
Staged bilateral rTSA performed within approximately one year of the index procedure is associated with significantly increased early surgical complications, whereas delaying contralateral surgery beyond 12 months is associated with a similar risk to that of unilateral rTSA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III, Retrospective Cohort Comparison using Large Database, Prognosis Study.