<- Back to digest

JAAOS - 2026-06-05 - Journal Article

Nutritional Optimization in Spine Surgery: A Review of Its Implications for Postoperative Recovery and Outcomes.

Ng MK, Mastrokostas LE, Mastrokostas PG, Razi A, Monas A, Bou Monsef J, Razi AE, Jazayeri R

systematic reviewLOE Vn = N/AN/A

Topics

spine
PMID: 42246762DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00757View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

Preoperative nutritional optimization—including protein supplementation, vitamin D correction, and carbohydrate loading—is associated with improved fusion rates, lower infection risk, and shorter hospital stays in spine surgery patients, though no single biomarker reliably identifies at-risk patients.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This narrative review synthesizes evidence on nutritional screening tools and targeted perioperative interventions in spine surgery patients. It evaluates protein/amino acid supplementation, vitamin D optimization, and preoperative carbohydrate loading as strategies linked to improved fusion rates, reduced surgical site infection, and accelerated recovery. The review identifies albumin as an unreliable standalone marker due to inflammatory confounding and advocates for multifactorial, multidisciplinary nutritional protocols.

Key Limitation

The review lacks a systematic search strategy and meta-analytic synthesis, making it impossible to quantify effect sizes or grade the strength of evidence for any specific nutritional intervention.

Original Abstract

Poor nutritional status is a modifiable risk factor that has been shown to have adverse outcomes in spine surgery, including higher rates of complications, poorer functional outcomes, longer hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. As such, interest has emerged in clinical practice regarding the use of tools and important nutrient profiles that can be used to assess nutritional status both pre- and postoperatively. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the current evidence surrounding the clinical utility of various nutritional screening tools, as well as to evaluate the importance of targeted interventions. These strategies include protein and amino acid supplementation, vitamin D optimization, and preoperative carbohydrate loading; prior studies have associated these interventions with improved fusion rates, lower infection risk, and accelerated recovery. Furthermore, economic analyses in the setting of nutritional optimization are explored. Despite these benefits, substantial barriers like inconsistent protocols and patient nonadherence remain. In addition, reliance on single markers like albumin may be misleading due to inflammatory confounding, highlighting the need for multifactorial assessment that incorporates surrogates of bone quality and baseline health status. As the spine surgical population ages and procedures grow more complex, preoperative nutritional optimization represents a low-risk strategy with potential for substantial advancements in patient recovery. This review advocates for the standardization of multidisciplinary nutritional protocols as a key component of comprehensive perioperative spine care.