JOA - 2026-06-10 - Journal Article
Dogma Under the Knife: Challenging the Status Quo in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Padgett BM, Terhune EB, Chalmers BP, Pagnano MW, Hannon CP
Topics
Key Takeaway
Persistent dissatisfaction in 10–20% of primary TKA patients despite technical success drives a paradigm shift toward individualized alignment, cementless fixation, expanded bearing options, and selective patellar resurfacing.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This symposium manuscript reviews contemporary evidence challenging four foundational TKA dogmas: alignment philosophy, fixation strategy, bearing surface selection, and patellar resurfacing. The authors argue that the 10–20% dissatisfaction rate despite durable implant survivorship justifies moving from rigid standardized protocols to patient-specific reconstruction strategies. No original data are presented; the manuscript synthesizes existing literature to provide a decision-making framework.
Key Limitation
As a symposium manuscript without original data, systematic search strategy, or meta-analytic synthesis, its conclusions are expert opinion and cannot be weighted against primary evidence.
Original Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is among the most successful procedures in orthopaedic surgery, reliably providing pain relief, functional improvement, and durable implant survivorship. Despite these achievements, approximately 10 to 20% of patients report persistent dissatisfaction following primary TKA, even in the absence of technical failure. This disconnect between implant longevity and patient-perceived success has prompted renewed examination of the foundational principles that have historically guided TKA practice. Advances in implant design, biomaterials, surgical technology, and a changing patient population have challenged long-standing dogma related to alignment philosophy, fixation strategy, bearing surface selection, and patellar resurfacing.
METHODS
This symposium manuscript reviews contemporary evidence addressing the evolving paradigms in primary TKA, with a focus on individualized alignment strategies, the growing role of cementless fixation, expanded bearing design options, and selective approaches to patellar resurfacing.
RESULTS
In each of these areas, the goal is not to promote a single new standard, but rather to provide an evidence-based framework to support thoughtful, patient-specific decision-making.
CONCLUSION
As the field continues to evolve, moving beyond rigid dogma toward personalized reconstruction strategies may represent a critical step in improving patient satisfaction while preserving the excellent survivorship that defines modern total knee arthroplasty.