KSSTA - 2026-07-09 - Journal Article
Concomitant meniscal repair and resection are not associated with ACL reoperation, and successful meniscal repair preserves patient-reported outcomes: A 2-year retrospective cohort study.
Kekki C, Cristiani R, Stålman A, von Essen C
Topics
Key Takeaway
Among 5,387 primary ACLRs, concomitant meniscal repair carried an 11.3% subsequent meniscal procedure rate versus 4.8% for resection, but successful repair achieved treatment failure rates (8.9%) comparable to isolated ACLR (5.4%).
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This study compared ACL reoperation rates and KOOS-based PROMs at 2 years among isolated ACLR, ACLR with concomitant meniscal repair (n=1,305), and ACLR with concomitant meniscal resection (n=1,097) at a single Swedish center. Meniscal repair was independently associated with subsequent meniscal procedures (OR=1.58, 95% CI 1.16–2.16), driven by failed repairs, which carried twice the odds of treatment failure (OR=2.04). ACL reoperation rates were equivalent across all three groups, and successful repair produced KOOS outcomes indistinguishable from isolated ACLR; lateral repair outperformed medial and combined repairs on PASS (58.2% vs. 45.2% vs. 36.6%).
Key Limitation
Two-year follow-up is insufficient to capture late repair failures and the progressive chondroprotective benefit of meniscal preservation versus resection, which typically diverges beyond 5 years.
Original Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare 2-year anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) reoperation rates, subsequent meniscal procedures, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between isolated ACLR and ACLR with concomitant meniscal repair or resection, including subgroup analyses of successful and failed repair, respectively, repair laterality. Higher subsequent meniscal procedure rates and inferior PROMs driven by failed repairs were hypothesised for concomitant repair, and inferior PROMs for combined versus medial or lateral repairs.
METHODS
Patients undergoing primary ACLR with or without concomitant meniscal procedure at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, (2015-2022) were included. ACL reoperations, subsequent meniscal procedures within 2 years were identified through medical records. The knee injury and osteoarthritis score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at 2 years. The PROMs minimal important change (MIC), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) and treatment failure (TF) were evaluated using KOOS 4 . Multivariable logistic regression was performed for subsequent meniscal procedure, ACL reoperation and PROMs. Subgroup analysis compared PROMs by repair success and repair laterality.
RESULTS
Among 5387 primary ACLRs, 1305 and 1097 underwent concomitant meniscal repair respectively resection. The mean age was 29.7 ± 12.1 years, 51.0% were male. Meniscal repair had more subsequent procedures (11.3%) than resection (4.8%) or isolated ACLR (5.4%, p = 0.02), and was associated with subsequent meniscal procedure (odds ratio [OR] = 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-2.16; p = 0.004). ACL reoperation rates were comparable across groups. Successful repair demonstrated MIC (40.0%), TF (8.9%), similar to isolated ACLR (31.4%, 5.4%). Failed repair was associated with TF (OR = 2.04, CI 1.06-4.31; p = 0.03). Lateral repair yielded superior MIC (45.2%, p = 0.04), PASS (58.2%, p < 0.001) than medial (37.1%, 45.2%), combined (32.4%, 36.6%) repair.
CONCLUSION
ACLR with concomitant meniscal repair showed higher rates of subsequent meniscal procedures and worse PROMs than isolated ACLR or concomitant meniscal resection, predominantly driven by failed repairs. Successful repairs achieved PROMs comparable to isolated ACLR. These findings support meniscal preservation, while emphasising the need to improve repair success.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III.