European Spine Journal - 2026-07-08 - Journal Article; Review
Intraoperative neuromonitoring in degenerative cervical myelopathy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and postoperative neurological outcomes.
Aghaei MM, Babaie A, Bagherzadeh S, Paeenmahali A, Roohollahi F, Greenberg M, Kumar J, Kim P, Rostami M, Alikhani P
Topics
Key Takeaway
Multimodal IONM achieves 76% sensitivity and 94% specificity (AUC 0.91) for detecting intraoperative neural injury in DCM surgery, yet pooled data from 5 comparative studies show no significant reduction in postoperative neurological deficits (RR ≈ 0.6, p = 0.23).
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated IONM diagnostic accuracy and its effect on postoperative neurological outcomes in DCM surgery across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library through August 2025. SSEP demonstrated low sensitivity (~33%) but high specificity (~99%), MEP showed moderate sensitivity (~61%) with high specificity (~95%), and multimodal IONM achieved the best performance (sensitivity ~76%, specificity ~94%, DOR ~70, AUC 0.91). Despite superior diagnostic accuracy, pooled analysis of 5 comparative studies found no statistically significant reduction in postoperative neurological deficits with IONM use (RR ≈ 0.6, p = 0.23).
Key Limitation
The comparative meta-analysis includes only 5 non-randomized studies, rendering the pooled RR statistically underpowered (p = 0.23) and unable to exclude clinically meaningful benefit, particularly given the low absolute event rates that further reduce statistical power.
Original Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) often requires surgical decompression but carries a risk of intraoperative neural injury. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is widely used to detect impending spinal cord compromise during such surgery, yet its impact on postoperative neurological outcomes remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated (1) the diagnostic accuracy of IONM modalities - somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), and multimodal monitoring - and (2) the effect of IONM versus no IONM on postoperative neurological outcomes in DCM.
METHODS
Conducted under PRISMA and PRISMA-DTA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251133125), we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through August 2025. Eligible studies involved adult DCM surgery with IONM. Two meta-analyses were performed: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis (pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for SSEP, MEP, and multimodal IONM), and a comparative meta-analysis (pooled risk ratios (RR) of new or worsened postoperative neurological deficits with vs. without IONM).
RESULTS
Forty-four studies (N = 154,972 patients) were included. SSEP had low pooled sensitivity (~ 33%) but high specificity (~ 99%) (DOR ~ 34, AUC 0.79); MEP showed moderate sensitivity (~ 61%) with high specificity (~ 95%) (DOR ~ 38, AUC 0.91). Multimodal IONM achieved higher sensitivity (~ 76%) with similarly high specificity (~ 94%) (DOR ~ 70, AUC 0.91). Five comparative studies found no significant reduction in postoperative neurological deficits with IONM (pooled RR ≈ 0.6, p = 0.23).
CONCLUSION
Multimodal IONM demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for detecting intraoperative neural injury in DCM surgery. However, its routine use did not significantly reduce postoperative neurological complication rates in this analysis, a finding that may partly reflect the limited number of comparative studies and the low absolute event rates. Our findings suggest that multimodal IONM should be considered most valuable for high-risk DCM patients and in complex procedures, where early detection of signal changes may alter surgical strategy.