<- Back to digest

JBJS - 2026-07-15 - Journal Article

Femoral Head Perfusion Varies Widely Following Surgical Reduction for Infantile Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Preliminary Findings from a Prospective Study of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Kebeh M, Sultan LR, Hall CE, Yaya C, Morgan T, Back SJ, Sankar WN

prospective cohortLOE IIn = 32 patients, 34 hipsIntraoperative only; longer follow-up ongoing per authors.

Topics

pediatrics
PMID: 41628265DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.25.00863View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

CEUS detected a post-reduction decrease in femoral head perfusion index in 79.4% of hips after surgical DDH reduction, with the greatest perfusion loss in the central epiphyseal region and axial abduction correlating with perfusion decrease (r=0.35, p=0.04).

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This prospective study used intraoperative CEUS to quantify femoral head perfusion changes before and after surgical reduction and spica casting in 34 hips of infants aged 4–18 months with DDH. Post-reduction perfusion index decreased in 79.4% of hips (p=0.003), with the central epiphyseal region showing the greatest decline (p=0.002); a minority of hips showed increased perfusion (p=0.03). Axial abduction in cast correlated with perfusion decrease (r=0.35, p=0.04) and BMI showed a moderate positive correlation with perfusion change (r=0.45, p=0.01).

Key Limitation

No radiographic or clinical PFGD outcome data are reported, so whether intraoperative CEUS perfusion changes actually predict PFGD development remains unproven.

Original Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical hip reduction is an accepted treatment option for infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) but may be complicated by the development of osteonecrosis, recently re-termed proximal femoral growth disturbance (PFGD) . Since the etiology of PFGD is likely related to compromised vascular supply to the femoral head, the need exists for an intraoperative method of assessing changes in femoral head perfusion prior to irreversible injury. This study sought to utilize contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to assess intraoperative changes in perfusion following surgical reduction for infantile DDH, with the ultimate goal of predicting and eventually preventing PFGD.

METHODS

In this prospective study, CEUS was performed before and immediately after surgical reduction and spica casting in infants undergoing surgery for DDH between 4 and 18 months of age. Delta projections were used to quantitatively analyze changes in perfusion, and a statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationships between patient factors, including casting position, and changes in epiphyseal perfusion.

RESULTS

The study population of 32 patients included 34 hips, comprising 30 hips of female patients (88.2%) and 4 hips of male patients (11.8%), with a mean age and standard deviation of 9.3 ± 3.3 months. A lower perfusion index following surgical reduction (p = 0.003) was seen in the majority (79.4%) of hips. In the remaining hips, a higher perfusion index was observed following reduction (p = 0.03). The greatest significant decreases in perfusion index were observed in the central region of the femoral head epiphysis (p = 0.002), followed by the peripheral region of the femoral head epiphysis (p = 0.03). Axial abduction was correlated with a post-reduction decrease in perfusion index (r = 0.35; p = 0.04). There was a moderately positive correlation between body mass index (BMI) and a post-reduction change in perfusion index (r = 0.45; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There was wide variation in post-reduction changes in femoral head perfusion after surgical hip reduction and spica casting for infantile DDH, with a gradient of change across the regions of the femoral head. In addition, BMI and in-cast hip position seemed to influence perfusion changes. With continued analysis of these relationships and longer follow-up from our ongoing prospective investigation, we aim to identify the risk factors for PFGD development.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.