<- Back to digest

JAAOS - 2026-07-15 - Journal Article

Custom Pelvic Implants in Complex Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Small RF, Koerner BJ, Lynch JR, Johnson CN

systematic reviewLOE Vn = N/AN/A

Topics

arthroplastybasic science
PMID: 42456064DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00991View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

Custom pelvic implants (CPIs) demonstrate high midterm-to-long-term implant survivorship in complex acetabular reconstruction, with most failures attributable to infection or instability rather than mechanical loosening.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This review addresses the role of CPIs in Paprosky IIIB and pelvic discontinuity cases where standard hemispherical cups, augments, and cages fail to achieve durable fixation. It synthesizes published outcomes on patient-specific CT-derived, additively manufactured monoblock constructs, covering design principles, surgical technique, and economic data. Published midterm-to-long-term data show high implant survivorship with low mechanical failure rates and cost comparability to other advanced reconstructive options.

Key Limitation

No pooled survivorship statistics or meta-analytic data are provided, making it impossible to derive a precise implant survival rate or complication incidence to guide evidence-based decision-making.

Original Abstract

Severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty present substantial reconstructive challenges, particularly when standard hemispherical cups, augments, or cages cannot achieve durable fixation or restore appropriate hip biomechanics. Custom pelvic implants (CPIs) are designed from patient-specific CT data and produced using additive manufacturing to create monoblock constructs that conform to bony defects and maximize fixation to remaining viable bone. This review summarizes the evolution of CPIs from early "triflange" devices to contemporary porous-coated, biomechanically optimized designs and outlines current nomenclature and indications. Key elements of preoperative evaluation, imaging protocols, and CT-based modeling are reviewed, along with implant design considerations including flange geometry, ischial fixation strategies, and screw trajectory planning. Surgical techniques for managing pelvic discontinuity are discussed with emphasis on achieving construct stability and promoting osseointegration. Published midterm to long-term outcomes demonstrate high implant survivorship, improved function, and low mechanical failure rates, with most revisions attributable to infection or instability. Economic analyses suggest CPIs are cost-comparable with other advanced reconstructive options while offering reliable fixation in complex cases. When applied with appropriate patient selection, careful design collaboration, and meticulous surgical execution, CPIs provide an effective and reproducible strategy for challenging acetabular reconstruction.