JOA - 2026-07-16 - Journal Article
Biomechanical Assessment of Pin-Site Fractures in Intra- versus Extra-Incisional Pinning Technique for Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cadaver Study.
Writing Committee, Liau ZQG, Shao-Rong Pang A, Kee Ern ET, Peng Ng MS, Meng CS, Kumarsing RA, Chan CK, Vachalam D, Lee ML, Po Hui JH, Yew A, Goodman S
Topics
Key Takeaway
Intra-incisional (metaphyseal) pinning in robotic TKA produced 28.6% higher femoral torsional rigidity and reduced overall specimen fracture rate from 80% to 30% compared to extra-incisional (diaphyseal) pinning.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This cadaveric study compared torsional rigidity and fracture risk between intra-incisional metaphyseal and extra-incisional diaphyseal tracker pin placement in robotic TKA using 20 matched femora and tibiae subjected to sequential torsional loading at 100 Nm and 300 Nm. Intra-incisional femora demonstrated significantly higher torsional rigidity at both 100 Nm (14.03 vs 10.91 Nm/degree, P=0.048) and 300 Nm (14.46 vs 10.91 Nm/degree, P=0.048), with only 20% fracturing at 100 Nm versus 80% of extra-incisional femora. Overall, 80% of extra-incisional specimens fractured versus 30% of intra-incisional specimens (P=0.025), and 50% of extra-incisional fractures involved the pin site directly compared to 0% in the intra-incisional group.
Key Limitation
The two-machine sequential loading protocol (100 Nm then 300 Nm) means specimens that survived the first stage were already stressed before the second stage, potentially confounding the 300 Nm rigidity comparisons and underestimating true failure thresholds.
Original Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) offers enhanced precision, but introduces new challenges, including pin-site fracture risk from tracker fixation, with incidence rates of 0.06 to 4.8%. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intra- versus extra-incisional pin placement on torsional rigidity to fracture failure in cadaver specimens.
METHODS
There were 20 matched cadaver femora and tibiae that were randomized to undergo either intra-incisional/metaphyseal or extra-incisional/diaphyseal pinning. Specimens were cemented into jigs and subjected to torsional load-to-failure in two stages, first at 100 Nm, then at 300 Nm, with two separate machines, with continuous monitoring of torque, rotation, and time. Fracture documentation and trendline analysis were performed to calculate torsional rigidity and coefficient of determination (R 2 ). Fracture characteristics, including pin-site involvement, and fracture patterns were also recorded.
RESULTS
Mean torsional rigidity was significantly higher for intra-incisional femora at both 100 Nm (14.03 versus 10.91 Nm/degree, P = 0.048) and 300 Nm (14.46 versus 10.91 Nm/degree, P = 0.048). There were 80% of extra-incisional femora that fractured when subjected to 100 Nm of torsion, compared to 20% of intra-incisional femora (P = 0.058). The mean torsional rigidity was 8.24 Nm/degree for intra-incisional compared to 6.35 Nm/degree for extra-incisional pinning for tibiae (P = 0.2), although this did not reach statistical significance. There were 80% of extra-incisional tibiae that fractured when subjected to 100 Nm of torsion, compared to 40% of intra-incisional tibiae. Overall, 80% of extra-incisional specimens fractured, compared to a significantly lower 30% of intra-incisional specimens (P = 0.025). There were half of the extra-incisional specimens had fractures that involved the pin site(s), compared to none in intra-incisional specimens.
CONCLUSION
Intra-incisional pin placement confers biomechanical advantages by having significantly higher torsional rigidity and reduced fracture risk, particularly of pin-site failures, in both femora and tibiae compared to extra-incisional pin placements. Patients who are encouraged to ambulate immediately after rTKA operations may have a better safety profile by using intra-incisional pinning techniques.