JAAOS - 2026-07-21 - Journal Article
Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Hypersensitivity From 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Mesh Dressings.
Aastroem K, Ossolinski G, Silverio L, Neuwirth AL, Cooper HJ, Shah RP
Topics
Key Takeaway
An enhanced chlorhexidine removal protocol before 2-octyl cyanoacrylate mesh dressing application reduced hypersensitivity reactions from 14.5% to 2.6% (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.70) in hip and knee arthroplasty patients.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This retrospective study compared a standard saline wipe (n=138) versus an enhanced isopropyl alcohol-then-saline removal protocol (n=76) of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol skin prep before 2-octyl cyanoacrylate mesh dressing application in hip and knee arthroplasty. The enhanced protocol reduced hypersensitivity from 14.5% to 2.6% (OR 0.16); both reactions in the enhanced group occurred in patients with known adhesive allergy. No differences were found in delayed wound healing, superficial infection, or deep infection, though folliculitis was higher in the enhanced group (3.9% vs. 0%, p=0.04).
Key Limitation
The retrospective, non-randomized design cannot exclude that temporal changes in surgical technique, patient selection, or dressing application practice—rather than the wash protocol itself—drove the reduction in hypersensitivity rates.
Original Abstract
BACKGROUND
Both 2-octyl cyanoacrylate mesh dressings and chlorhexidine gluconate are independently associated with hypersensitivity. Residual chlorhexidine antiseptic trapped under an impermeable mesh dressing may synergistically contribute to skin reactions. We hypothesized that an enhanced washing protocol before dressing application would reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity. We secondarily compared delayed wound healing, infection, and sensitization from prior exposure with mesh dressings.
METHODS
This retrospective study reviewed 214 hip and knee arthroplasty patients receiving 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol skin paint and a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate mesh dressing. The standard wash protocol (n = 138) informally wiped the skin prep with saline. The enhanced wash protocol (n = 76) thoroughly removed the skin prep with an isopropyl alcohol-soaked sponge followed by a saline soaked sponge. The chart was reviewed for hypersensitivity, wound healing, infection, and prior exposure.
RESULTS
The enhanced wash protocol was associated with a notable decrease in the rate of hypersensitivity from 14.5 to 2.6% (OR 0.16, 95% CI, [0.04-0.70]). The two reactions in the enhanced protocol occurred immediately and both subsequently revealed a history of adhesive allergy. More folliculitis was observed in the enhanced group (3.9 vs. 0%, P = 0.04). No differences were observed in delayed wound healing, superficial infection, or deep infection (P = 0.75, 0.53, and 1, respectively). Prior mesh exposure had no effect on hypersensitivity.
CONCLUSION
We observed that thorough removal of durable chlorhexidine paint was associated with a lower incidence of hypersensitivity after application of impermeable mesh dressings. The study findings support efforts to reduce chlorhexidine concentration on the skin before the application of dressings. In the absence of a prospective study, we recommend making this inexpensive and simple protocol change before application of a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate mesh dressing to surgical wounds.