<- Back to digest

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics - 2026-08-27 - Journal Article

Is Susceptibility to Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Linked to Obesity-Associated Proximal Femoral Morphology?

Wu J, Zhang D, Canavese F, Li M, Li L

retrospective cohortLOE IIIn = 84 (42 obese, 42 controls) plus a separate retrospective SCFE cohort (size not specified beyond institutional 2011–2025 series)N/A

Topics

pediatrics
PMID: 42644216DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000003453View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

After stratifying by modified Oxford bone score, obesity does not independently alter proximal femoral morphology, suggesting the elevated SCFE risk in obese children is driven by mechanical load or obesity-related physiology rather than anatomy.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This study tested whether obesity-associated proximal femoral morphology (femoral head diameter, epiphyseal cupping ratio, Alsberg angle, posterior sloping angle) independently predisposes to SCFE. Obese children aged 6–12 showed smaller Alsberg angles (63.6° vs. 66.1°, P=0.022) and larger posterior sloping angles (4.7° vs. 2.6°, P=0.049) compared to normal-weight controls, but these differences disappeared after stratification by modified Oxford bone score. Obese children reached equivalent skeletal maturity approximately one year earlier than normal-weight peers, and obese SCFE patients were similarly about one year younger than normal-weight SCFE patients at equivalent mOBS (19.2 vs. 19.8, P=0.199).

Key Limitation

The SCFE cohort is drawn from a single institution over 14 years without reporting its size, limiting the validity of the age-at-onset comparison between obese and normal-weight SCFE patients.

Original Abstract

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is strongly associated with obesity, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study evaluated whether alterations in proximal femoral morphology (PFM) associated with obesity contribute to susceptibility to SCFE, after accounting for chronological age and skeletal maturity.

METHODS

Two groups of patients were studied. The first was a group of 42 obese children (6 to 15 y) and 42 age- and sex-matched normal-weight controls. Femoral head diameter, epiphyseal cupping ratio (ECR), Alsberg angle (AA), and posterior sloping angle (PSA) were measured on pelvic radiographs. Skeletal maturity was assessed using the modified Oxford bone score (mOBS). PFM was compared under conditions of chronological age matching and skeletal maturity stratification. The second group was a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with SCFE at our institution between 2011 and 2025. Chronological age at onset and skeletal maturity were compared between obese and normal-weight patients.

RESULTS

At 6 to 9 years, obese children matched by chronological age showed a larger femoral head diameter, greater ECR, a smaller AA (63.6±3.7 vs. 66.1±4.1 degrees, P=0.022), and a larger PSA (4.7±3.6 vs. 2.6±4.2 degrees, P=0.049); These differences remained at 10 to 12 years but disappeared by 13 to 15 years. The mOBS was higher in the obese group at 6 to 9 and 10 to 12 years (P=0.032 and P<0.001, respectively) but was similar between groups at 13 to 15 years (P=0.522). After stratification by skeletal maturity, anatomic differences between groups were no longer significant. At equivalent mOBS levels, obese children were about a year younger than normal-weight children (P<0.05). In the SCFE group, obese patients were about a year younger than normal-weight patients, despite similar mOBS scores (19.2±1.4 vs. 19.8±2.0; P=0.199).

CONCLUSION

Obesity accelerates skeletal maturation by about 1 year and is a risk factor for SCFE. However, after adjusting for skeletal maturity, obesity does not alter PFM. Therefore, the increased risk of SCFE in obese children is likely due to high body weight or obesity-related factors, not anatomic characteristics of the proximal femur.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-diagnostic study.