Arthroscopy - 2026-08-24 - Journal Article
Labral Augmentation Decreases Humeral Head Displacement and Cartilage Stress in an Anterior Shoulder Instability Model With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss: A Finite Element Analysis.
Li X, Li B, Feng J, Li B, Wu D, Huang W, Zhu Z, Chen H
Topics
Key Takeaway
In a finite element model of anterior shoulder instability with 13.5–25% glenoid bone loss, labral augmentation restored humeral head displacement to control levels (8.10 ± 0.58 mm vs. 7.61 ± 0.46 mm, P=.18), outperforming isolated Bankart repair and Bankart plus remplissage.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This FEA study asked whether labral augmentation better restores glenohumeral biomechanics than Bankart repair alone or Bankart plus remplissage in shoulders with subcritical glenoid bone loss (13.5–25%). Five patient-derived CT-based finite element models were tested across four surgical configurations, with contralateral intact shoulders as controls. Labral augmentation normalized humeral head displacement, capsular stress, and glenoid and humeral head cartilage stress to control-equivalent values, while Bankart repair with or without remplissage did not.
Key Limitation
The sample of five models is too small to capture the full spectrum of subcritical bone loss morphology, Hill-Sachs engagement patterns, and soft tissue quality, limiting generalizability of the biomechanical conclusions.
Original Abstract
PURPOSE
To investigate the influence of labral augmentation on glenohumeral biomechanics for anterior glenohumeral instability patients via finite element analysis (FEA).
METHODS
A shoulder finite element model was derived from preoperative computed tomography scans of five patients with anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss (13.5%-25% of inferior glenoid width). Four models were established based on the affected shoulders, including a model of Bankart lesion combined with subcritical glenoid bone loss, a model of isolated Bankart repair, a model of Bankart repair plus remplissage, and a model of labral augmentation. The contralateral, unaffected shoulders served as normal controls. These five models were tested to assess humeral head displacement and stress on the joint capsule and cartilage.
RESULTS
Labral augmentation outperformed Bankart repair with or without remplissage in restoring native joint characteristics. It limited humeral head displacement to control-like levels (8.10 ± 0.58 vs 7.61 ± 0.46 mm, P = .18), normalized capsular stress (2.00 ± 0.20 vs 1.82 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .221), and reduced cartilage stress on the glenoid and humeral head to pre-injury baselines (glenoid: 2.65 ± 0.18 vs 2.75 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .484; humeral head: 29.70 ± 1.92 vs 30.31 ± 1.93 MPa, P = .630).
CONCLUSIONS
In this FEA of anterior shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss, labral augmentation decreased humeral head displacement and restored articular cartilage stress to an intact state compared to Bankart repair with or without remplissage.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This FEA study suggests labral augmentation in the context of subcritical bone loss may be a viable surgical treatment option for patients with shoulder instability.