JOA - 2026-09-04 - Journal Article
Assessment of a Novel Radiographic Index and Functional Outcomes After Secondary Patellar Resurfacing: A Matched Cohort Study.
Carlisi G, Familiari F, Gasparini G, Vescio A, Deckard ER, Meneghini RM, Calafiore G
Topics
Key Takeaway
Secondary patellar resurfacing significantly improved VAS, KSS, and OKS scores (P<0.005) in patients with anterior knee pain after unresurfaced primary TKA, and a novel GC Index (AFO/APD ratio) identified these patients with 82.93% sensitivity and 85.37% specificity.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This matched retrospective cohort asked whether secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) improves outcomes in patients with idiopathic anterior knee pain (AKP) after unresurfaced primary TKA, and whether radiographic parameters predict postoperative AKP. SPR produced statistically significant improvements in VAS, KSS, and OKS (P<0.005). A novel GC Index—ratio of anterior femoral offset to anterior patellar displacement—independently predicted postoperative AKP with 82.93% sensitivity and 85.37% specificity, outperforming standard radiographic parameters.
Key Limitation
Follow-up duration is not reported, making it impossible to determine whether functional gains from SPR are durable or whether the GC Index thresholds generalize beyond this single-center cohort.
Original Abstract
BACKGROUND
This study evaluated the effectiveness of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) on clinical outcomes in patients who experienced anterior knee pain (AKP) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without concomitant patellar resurfacing. The study also investigated the association between radiographic parameters and postoperative AKP and explored whether a novel radiographic index was associated with postoperative AKP.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort of 246 patients was analyzed, including 82 patients who had idiopathic AKP following TKA and were treated with SPR, and 164 matched controls who underwent primary TKA without patellar resurfacing and did not develop postoperative AKP. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), showed statistically significant improvement in the SPR group (P < 0.005), while radiographic parameters demonstrated limited discriminative value.
RESULTS
A newly developed metric, the GC Index, defined as the ratio of anterior femoral offset (AFO) to anterior patellar displacement (APD), demonstrated good discriminative performance within the present cohort, with a sensitivity of 82.93% and specificity of 85.37%, and remained independently associated with postoperative AKP after adjustment for relevant confounding factors.
CONCLUSION
These findings support the potential role of SPR in managing persistent AKP after TKA and suggest that the GC Index may represent a potential adjunctive radiographic marker requiring further prospective validation.