KSSTA - 2026-09-11 - Journal Article
The role of generalised joint Laxity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Za P, Papalia GF, Caria C, Minelli M, Basciani S, Vasta S
Topics
Key Takeaway
GJL patients after ACLR have 2.62× higher odds of positive Lachman and 2.25× higher odds of positive pivot-shift versus non-GJL patients, with a non-significant trend toward higher graft failure (9.2% vs. 6.1%, OR=3.15, p=0.07).
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether GJL adversely affects outcomes after primary ACLR by pooling 13 studies using PRISMA 2020 and PICO frameworks with MINORS quality assessment. GJL patients had significantly worse IKDC scores (85.2 vs. 87.7, MD=-3.27, p=0.05) and Lysholm scores (88.5 vs. 93.5, MD=-4.05, p=0.005), along with significantly higher rates of residual Lachman and pivot-shift positivity. Graft failure trended higher in GJL (9.2% vs. 6.1%, OR=3.15) but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.07), likely reflecting inadequate power across the pooled cohort.
Key Limitation
Inconsistent GJL definitions (variable Beighton score thresholds) across included studies preclude a standardized dose-response relationship between laxity severity and outcome magnitude.
Original Abstract
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess whether patients with generalised joint laxity (GJL) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have a higher risk of graft failure, worse clinical outcomes and greater residual instability compared to non-lax individuals.
METHODS
In accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses 2020 guidelines and the PICO frameworks, studies relating to PROMs, residual laxity and re-injury rate or graft failure of patients with GJL after primary ACLR were sought for inclusion. The comparison, when available, consisted of patients without GJL undergoing primary ACLR MINORS was used for the methodological assessment.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies were included. A total of 3905 patients were included, of whom 55% were male and 45% female. The mean age was 27.5 years (range, 23.4-29.7 years). The mean follow-up period was 41.1 months (range, 12-96 months). International Knee Documentation Committee score showed statistically significant results in favour of non-GJL group (mean value 87.7 ± 10.1) compared to GJL group (mean value 85.2 ± 11.6) (MD = -3.27, p = 0.05). Lysholm Knee Score was significantly higher in non-GJL group (mean value 93.5 ± 5.8) compared to GJL group (mean value 88.5 ± 6.3) (MD = -4.05, p = 0.005). The rates of positivity of Lachman test (OR = 2.62, p < 0.0001) and pivot shift test (OR = 2.25, p = 0.0007) were significantly higher in GJL group. The rate of ACL reconstruction failure was 9.2% in GJL group and 6.1% in non-GJL group without statistical significance (OR = 3.15, p = 0.07).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with GJL appear to have increased postoperative residual knee laxity after ACL reconstruction compared with patients without GJL. Clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous, while no statistically significant differences in graft failure rates were identified. Given the heterogeneity of clinical outcomes, future studies should clarify whether the greater residual laxity represents a clinically relevant disadvantage or whether it can be well tolerated without a meaningful impact on patient-reported and functional outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III.