<- Back to digest

Injury - 2026-09-10 - Journal Article

Occupational recovery after work-related AO Spine type A1 compression fractures: Association between treatment strategy and sick-leave duration.

Jordá-Gómez P, Saiz-Sapena N, Vanaclocha L, Barrios C, Vanaclocha V

retrospective cohortLOE IIIn = 70Not reported as a mean follow-up; sick-leave duration tracked until return to work (median 62–178 days depending on treatment group).

Topics

spine
PMID: 42731143DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113712View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

In work-related AO Spine type A1 thoracolumbar compression fractures, vertebroplasty was associated with a median sick-leave of 62 days versus 144.5 days for bracing and 178 days for arthrodesis—a 3.1-fold difference between the shortest and longest groups.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This retrospective cohort evaluated sick-leave duration as the primary occupational outcome in 70 adults with work-related AO Spine type A1 thoracolumbar fractures treated with vertebroplasty (n=35), bracing (n=18), or posterior arthrodesis (n=17) at a single tertiary center from 2007–2025. Multivariable linear regression on log-transformed sick-leave duration showed treatment strategy was independently associated with occupational recovery; vertebroplasty produced the shortest sick leave (median 62 days, IQR 38–94) compared to bracing (144.5 days, IQR 112–186) and arthrodesis (178 days, IQR 120–327). Age and associated injury severity were not independently associated with sick-leave duration.

Key Limitation

Non-randomized treatment allocation is the critical limitation; systematic differences in fracture severity, bone quality, or surgeon preference between groups likely confound the observed sick-leave differences and preclude causal conclusions.

Original Abstract

PURPOSE

Return-to-work (RTW) is an important indicator of functional recovery after spinal trauma, yet occupational outcomes following stable thoracolumbar compression fractures remain poorly characterized. This study evaluated factors associated with sick-leave duration and occupational recovery in patients with work-related AO Spine type A1 vertebral compression fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adults with work-related AO Spine type A1 thoracolumbar compression fractures without neurological deficit treated at a tertiary referral center between 2007 and 2025. Patients underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty, orthopedic bracing, or posterior spinal arthrodesis. The primary outcome was sick-leave duration, defined as the interval between injury and resolution of work capacity. Multivariable linear regression using log-transformed sick-leave duration was performed to identify factors independently associated with occupational recovery.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included: 35 underwent vertebroplasty, 18 orthopedic bracing, and 17 spinal arthrodesis. Sick-leave duration differed significantly among treatment groups (p < 0.001). Median sick-leave duration was 62 days (IQR 38-94) after vertebroplasty, 144.5 days (IQR 112-186) after orthopedic bracing, and 178 days (IQR 120-327) after spinal arthrodesis. In multivariable analysis, treatment strategy remained independently associated with sick-leave duration. Compared with vertebroplasty, sick leave was approximately 2.2 times longer after orthopedic bracing and 3.1 times longer after spinal arthrodesis. Age and associated injury severity were not independently associated with sick-leave duration. Stratified analyses demonstrated a similar gradient in occupational recovery among patients without major associated injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of work-related AO Spine type A1 vertebral compression fractures, treatment strategy was strongly associated with occupational recovery. Patients treated with vertebroplasty had shorter sick leave than those managed with orthopedic bracing or spinal arthrodesis. Because treatment allocation was non-randomized, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than evidence of causality. Prospective studies incorporating standardized functional and occupational outcomes are needed to clarify the role of different treatment strategies.