<- Back to digest

JOT - 2026-09-18 - Journal Article

Outcomes of early vs delayed medial malleolar fixation in the treatment of open ankle fractures.

Hughes IX, Baka DR, Wright BJ, Dibato JE, Gentile PM, Hwang R, Graf KW, Mashru RP, Dolch HJ

retrospective cohortLOE IIIn = 99N/A if not reported.

Topics

traumafoot ankle
PMID: 42757705DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003280View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

Early fixation of open ankle fractures involving the medial malleolus carries a 22% infection rate versus 9% with delayed fixation, reaching statistical significance (p=0.049) in bimalleolar and trimalleolar subgroups.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This retrospective single-center study compared early versus delayed ORIF for open ankle fractures involving the medial malleolus (AO/OTA A2–C3) across 99 patients. Early fixation reduced LOS (7.8 vs 12.8 days, p=0.0004) and mean operations (1.3 vs 2.4, p<0.0001) but was associated with a numerically higher infection rate (22% vs 9%, p=0.09) that reached significance in the bimalleolar/trimalleolar subgroup (22% vs 7%, p=0.049). Union rates, antibiotic use, time to weight bearing, and pain scores did not differ significantly between groups.

Key Limitation

The non-randomized assignment to early versus delayed fixation almost certainly reflects surgeon judgment about wound quality and injury severity, meaning the groups are not comparable and the observed infection rate difference may reflect case selection rather than a true effect of timing.

Original Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate outcomes after early versus delayed fixation of clean open ankle fractures involving the medial malleolus.

METHODS

Design: Retrospective review.

SETTING

Single-center academic Level I trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation from November 2016 to July 2024 for an open ankle fracture involving the medial malleolus (AO/OTA A2-C3).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Infection rate, length of stay, number of operations, and return to the operating room were compared between early and delayed fixation groups.

RESULTS

The early fixation group consisted of 55 patients (67% female; mean age 55.8 ± 21.1 years), while the delayed fixation group consisted of 44 patients (68% female; mean age 57.5 ± 15.9 years). Infection rates were 22% in the early group and 9% in the delayed group (p=0.09). Early, compared to delayed, fixation was associated with a shorter length of stay (7.8 vs. 12.8 days; p=0.0004), lower external fixation rate (11% vs 82%) and fewer operations (1.3 vs. 2.4; p<0.0001). Wound care was initiated more frequently in the early fixation group (56% vs 27%; p=0.0037). However, there were no statistically significant differences in union rates, antibiotic use, time to full weight bearing, pain scores, or symptomatic nonunion (P>0.05). A post hoc analysis excluding isolated medial malleolus fractures demonstrated a higher infection rate in the early fixation cohort (22% vs 7%; p=0.0487).

CONCLUSION

Early fixation was associated with a higher observed infection rate, particularly in bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures, although this difference did not reach statistical significance in the overall cohort. Early fixation may be appropriate in select cases to reduce hospital resource utilization. However, surgeons should use caution when considering early fixation of higher energy injuries such as open bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.