Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery - 2026-03-24 - Journal Article; Review
Pelvic insufficiency fractures after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer in female patients: an updated meta-analysis of 11,272 patients.
Gao M, Qiu Z, Xu Z, Zhao C, Zhong F, Gao T
Topics
Key Takeaway
Pooled pelvic insufficiency fracture incidence after pelvic radiotherapy is 17% (95% CI: 15–20%) across 11,272 female patients, with sacral/SI joint involvement in 71% of cases and definitive RT carrying a 25% fracture rate versus 6% with adjuvant RT.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This updated meta-analysis quantified pelvic insufficiency fracture (PIF) incidence and associated risk factors in female patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic, anal, or rectal cancers using studies from 1980–April 2025. Pooled PIF incidence was 17% (95% CI: 15–20%), exceeding the prior 2019 estimate of 14%; IMRT reduced risk to 8% versus 22% with AP/PA techniques, while VMAT and C-ion RT showed 30% rates attributed to higher doses (≥55 Gy). Sacral/SI joint was the dominant fracture site (71%), and MRI detected more PIFs than other modalities (19% vs. 14%).
Key Limitation
The 30% PIF rate with VMAT and C-ion RT cannot be attributed to technique versus dose escalation (≥55 Gy), limiting guidance on whether these modern modalities independently increase fracture risk.
Original Abstract
BACKGROUND
Pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) are a debilitating complication of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) for pelvic cancer in female patients, which could lead to a sharp decline in patients’ quality of life. A 2019 meta-analysis by Lucas Gomes Sapienza reported a PIF rate of 14%, but advancements in RT techniques (IMRT, VMAT, C-ion RT) and new published studies necessitate an updated analysis. This study aimed to re-evaluate PIF incidence, fracture location, and associated factors using recent high-quality evidence.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (1980–April 2025) with cohort studies for gynecologic/anal/rectal cancers, pelvic insufficiency fractures. Data on PIF incidence, location, and RT methods were extracted. Random-effects models were used to address expected high heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were explored in detail.
RESULTS
The pooled PIF incidence was 17% (95% CI: 15–20%), higher than the prior 14% estimate. Sacral bone/sacroiliac joint involvement dominated (71%), followed by pubic bone (11.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed higher PIF rates with definitive RT (25%) vs. adjuvant RT (6%). Modern RT techniques (IMRT: 8%, 3D-CRT: 11%) reduced PIF risk vs. historical methods (AP/PA: 22%, 4-field: 18%). However, VMAT and C-ion RT showed elevated rates (30%), likely due to higher doses (≥ 55 Gy). Regional difference indicates Europe (23%) > Asia (20%) > USA (9%). MRI detected more PIFs (19%) than other modalities (14%). Low BMI (16%) and menopause (18%) correlated with higher PIF risk.
CONCLUSION
The incidence of PIF after pelvic RT has risen in recent years. Sacral regions are highly likely to develop PIF. Modern RT techniques like IMRT are required, along with routine MRI surveillance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-026-06269-5.