<- Back to digest

JOA - 2026-06-01 - Journal Article

Global Offset Restoration: A Critical Factor Influencing Limb-Length Correction after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Lu LY, Lu SY, Lee CH, Chang CH, Hsieh PH, Lin YC

retrospective cohortLOE IIIn = 186 (72 LCPD, 114 matched OA controls)Minimum 1 year (Harris Hip Score reported at 1 year).

Topics

arthroplastypediatrics
PMID: 41106707DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.10.021View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

In THA for LCPD, 29% of patients had residual postoperative LLD ≥10 mm, and inadequate global offset restoration correlated negatively with residual LLD (rho = -0.44, p = 0.0001), a relationship absent in primary OA controls.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This retrospective matched cohort compared radiographic and clinical outcomes of THA in 72 LCPD patients versus 114 primary OA controls matched for sex, side, CCI, age, BMI, and surgery year. Despite greater preoperative LLD in LCPD (1.70 vs 0.93 mm, p<0.001), mean postoperative LLD was equivalent between groups (0.85 vs 0.82 mm, p=0.52); however, 29% of LCPD patients had residual LLD ≥10 mm. This subgroup demonstrated significantly lower 1-year Harris Hip Scores (88.5 vs 93.5, p<0.001) and a significant negative correlation between global offset restoration and residual LLD (rho=-0.44, p=0.0001) not seen in OA controls.

Key Limitation

The study does not report the specific implant types, femoral offset options utilized, or whether trochanteric advancement was performed, making it impossible to determine which reconstructive strategies successfully restored global offset.

Original Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limb-length discrepancy (LLD) correction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients who have Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) remains challenging due to anatomical deformities. Identifying biomechanical factors associated with residual LLD may improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective matched cohort study included 72 patients undergoing THA for LCPD and 114 matched patients who had primary osteoarthritis (OA). Matching criteria included sex, surgical side, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgery year, age, and body mass index. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed for LLD, global offset restoration, and implant positioning parameters. Clinical outcomes and complication rates were also evaluated. Spearman's correlation was utilized to examine associations between postoperative global offset restoration and residual LLD.

RESULTS

Preoperative LLD was significantly greater in LCPD patients compared to primary OA (1.70 ± 1.23 versus 0.93 ± 0.71 mm; P < 0.001), yet postoperative LLD was comparable (0.85 ± 0.88 versus 0.82 ± 0.74 mm; P = 0.52). A subgroup of LCPD patients (29%) had persistent postoperative LLD ≥ 10 mm, significantly associated with inadequate global offset restoration and lower Harris Hip Score at 1-year follow-up compared to those who had an LLD < 10 mm (88.5 ± 9 versus 93.5 ± 4; P < 0.001). A significant negative correlation (rho = -0.44, P = 0.0001) was identified between global offset restoration and residual LLD in the LCPD group, a correlation not observed in primary OA. Surgical details and postoperative complications were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A THA successfully corrects LLD in most LCPD patients, but a subgroup remains at risk for residual shortening. Insufficient global offset restoration significantly correlates with greater residual LLD, highlighting the importance of offset reconstruction to achieve optimal limb-length equalization. Surgeons should prioritize restoring global offset alongside leg-length correction in patients undergoing THA for LCPD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.