JSES - 2026-09-01 - Journal Article
Humeral resting abduction influences LSA and DSA: a radiographic and CT-derived 3D model analysis of rTSA using the Medacta shoulder system.
Mitrousias V, Dor J, Farias A, Devigne J, Cunningham G
Topics
Key Takeaway
Humeral resting abduction angle (HARA) systematically alters LSA by up to 5° and DSA by up to 9° across the 10°–30° HARA range, with 95% of postoperative radiographs showing inter-visit HARA variability averaging 10°.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This study quantified how humeral resting abduction affects LSA and DSA using both preoperative CT-derived 3D models and serial postoperative radiographs in Medacta rTSA patients. In 3D models, increasing HARA from 10° to 30° decreased DSA from 48° to 39° and increased LSA from 84° to 89° (P<.001 for both). On postoperative radiographs, 95% of cases showed inter-visit HARA variability, and every consecutive radiograph pair confirmed the same directional relationship between HARA and both angular metrics (P<.001).
Key Limitation
No clinical outcome data are reported, so the magnitude of HARA-induced LSA/DSA measurement error that actually alters surgical decision-making or outcome prediction remains unknown.
Original Abstract
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of humeral abduction, as expressed by the humeral abduction resting angle (HARA) and scapular HARA (SHARA) on the lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA) using a) three-dimensional computed tomography-derived reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) preoperative models, and b) consecutive postoperative radiographs obtained at multiple follow-up time points.
METHODS
Three-dimensional computed tomography-derived models generated using preoperative planning software and postoperative radiographs of patients who underwent rTSA using the Medacta Shoulder System, with at least one year of follow-up, were analyzed. In the 3D models, HARA was adjusted to 10°, 20°, and 30°, and LSA and DSA were measured at each position and compared using one-way analysis of variance. For each patient, consecutive radiographs were obtained on postoperative day 1 and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. HARA and SHARA were measured on each radiograph. Then, pairs of consecutive radiographs were grouped according to their difference in
HARA
<10°, 10°-20°, and >20°. Independent-samples t-tests were used for pairwise comparisons. Intrarater reliability and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson's and Spearman's coefficients were applied to investigate possible correlations.
RESULTS
In total, 45 preoperative 3D models and 135 postoperative radiographs were analyzed. In the 3D model analysis, mean DSA decreased from 48° at 10° of HARA to 44° at 20°, and 39° at 30° (P < .001), whereas mean LSA increased from 84° at 10° of HARA to 86° at 20°, and 89° at 30° (P < .001). When examining radiographs, variability in HARA was present in 95% of the cases. The mean HARA difference between pairs of consecutive radiographs was 10° ± 10°. All comparisons performed in the respective pairs of radiographs showed the same pattern: in every pair, the radiograph with the higher HARA and SHARA demonstrated significantly higher LSA and significantly lower DSA (P < .001). The intrarater ICC was 0.98 for DSA and 0.99 for LSA for 3D measurements, whereas the inter-rater ICC was 0.77 for DSA, 0.79 for LSA, 0.86 for HARA, and 0.81 for SHARA for radiographic measurements. There was a statistically significant, moderate positive correlation between HARA, SHARA, and LSA and a statistically significant moderate to strong negative correlation between HARA, SHARA, and DSA in both 3D models and radiographs (P < .001).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this study shows that shoulder resting abduction significantly affects both LSA and DSA after rTSA. Higher humeral abduction results in higher LSA and lower DSA in both 3D models and radiographs. Humeral abduction should therefore be taken into account when planning lateralization and distalization in rTSA, and it should be controlled in future studies evaluating correlations with clinical outcomes.