<- Back to digest

JBJS - 2026-03-04 - Journal Article; Comparative Study

Fluoroscopy-Guided Lateral Tibial Plateau Fracture Fixation with and without Needle Arthroscopy: A Biomechanical and Reduction-Quality Comparison.

Mzeihem M, Zabawa L, Park Y, Crespo A, Raji Y, Amirouche F

cadavericLOE Vn = 16 cadaveric knee specimensN/A

Topics

basic scienceoncologytrauma
PMID: 41417880DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.25.00793View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

Fluoroscopy plus needle arthroscopy guidance achieved 68% higher load to failure (1,784 vs. 1,063 N) compared to fluoroscopy alone for lateral tibial plateau fracture fixation in a cadaveric model.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This cadaveric RCT compared fluoroscopy-guided (FG) versus fluoroscopy plus needle arthroscopy-guided (FNG) fixation of standardized lateral tibial plateau fractures via anterolateral approach in 16 specimens. FNG produced superior articular reduction (step-off 2.26 vs. 2.44 mm; depression 1.69 vs. 1.77 mm) and load to failure (1,784 vs. 1,063 N), while FG demonstrated greater stiffness (170.34 vs. 130.82 N/mm) and higher radiation exposure. Operative time was shorter in the FNG group (1,524 vs. 1,662 seconds), contradicting the assumption that arthroscopic adjuncts add procedural time.

Key Limitation

The cadaveric model eliminates soft tissue swelling, hemarthrosis, and surgeon learning-curve effects that critically influence arthroscopic visualization and reduction quality in clinical practice.

Original Abstract

BACKGROUND

Articular depression, especially in central tibial plateau segments, is surgically challenging. According to the 10-segment classification, the anterolateral approach visualizes only 36.6% of the tibial plateau. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanical performance between fluoroscopy-guided fixation techniques with and without needle arthroscopy.

METHODS

This cadaveric study used 16 knee specimens with standardized lateral tibial plateau fractures. Specimens were randomized to fluoroscopy-guided (FG) or fluoroscopy plus needle arthroscopy-guided (FNG) reduction performed via an anterolateral approach. Kirschner wires and proximal tibial plates were used for fixation. The primary outcome was load to failure. Secondary outcomes included stress, strain, stiffness, reduction quality, radiation exposure, and operative time.

RESULTS

Sixteen cadaveric specimens (9 right knees; 12 males) were studied. The FG group had greater mean articular depression (1.77 versus 1.69 mm) and step-off (2.44 versus 2.26 mm) than the FNG group. The FNG group had a higher mean load to failure (1,784 versus 1,063 N), whereas the FG group had greater mean stiffness (170.34 versus 130.82 N/mm) and a longer mean operative time (1,662 versus 1,524 seconds). The FG group also demonstrated higher mean fluoroscopic doses and larger differences in condylar width and the medial tibial plateau angle than the FNG group.

CONCLUSIONS

FNG reduction improved articular congruity and load to failure in lateral tibial plateau fractures without increasing operative time, supporting needle arthroscopy as a valuable adjunct for managing complex articular fractures with less invasive exposure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study is clinically relevant because it shows that incorporating needle arthroscopy during fixation of lateral tibial plateau fractures can improve reduction quality and stability without prolonging operative time.