<- Back to digest

JAAOS - 2026-05-15 - Journal Article

More Short Term Pain in Noncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Hurdle E, Strecker S, Nagarkatti D, Shekhman M, Goldberg L, Carangelo RJ, Witmer D

retrospective cohortLOE IIIn = 458 (229 per group, matched from initial cohort of 4,275)1 year with assessments at 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year

Topics

arthroplasty
PMID: 41232093DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00644View on PubMed ->

Key Takeaway

Noncemented TKA patients required 35% more opioids inpatient (MME 101.4 vs 75.0, p<0.001) and were significantly less likely to forget their joint at 1 year (51% vs 75.3%, p=0.002) compared to matched cemented TKA patients.

Summary Depth

Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.

Summary

This matched cohort study compared early pain, opioid consumption, and 1-year PROs between cemented and noncemented primary TKA patients at a single high-volume institution, matching on MAKO use, sex, and age. Noncemented patients had significantly higher inpatient pain with activity (4.8 vs 4.4, p=0.031) and consumed 26 more MME inpatient (101.4 vs 75.0, p<0.001). KOOS-JR scores were equivalent at all time points after adjusting for baseline differences, but Forgotten Joint Scores were significantly worse in the noncemented group (44.3 vs 56.6, p=0.013).

Key Limitation

Pooling of multiple noncemented implant designs prevents determination of whether the pain and awareness disadvantage is a class effect or attributable to specific implant geometry, surface coating, or tibial fixation construct.

Original Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the resurgence of noncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following implant advancements in recent years, instances of greater postoperative pain remain a common finding compared with TKAs with cemented fixation. Newer noncemented designs have become appealing to younger, heavier, and active patients, with appropriate bone stock.

METHODS

A matched cohort analysis of patients undergoing primary, unilateral cemented and noncemented TKAs at a high-volume, orthopaedic specialty hospital. Enrolled patients had their index procedure between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. The initial cohort was 4,275 patients, with 455 noncemented and 3,820 cemented TKA patients. Patients were matched 1:1, with MAKO instrumentation and sex being matched exactly, while age was matched within 2 years, yielding 229 patients per group. Patient-reported outcomes were completed preoperatively, at 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. Forgotten Joint scores were assessed at 1 year.

RESULTS

Patients' reported pain levels during their inpatient stay were higher in noncemented TKA patients, with pain values of 3.1 (±1.5) versus 3.2 (±1.7) at rest ( P = 0.397) and 4.4 (±1.6) versus 4.8 (±1.8) with activity ( P = 0.031). Morphine Milligram Equivalents were 26 points higher in the noncemented group (101.4 vs. 75.0, P < 0.001). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement were similar between cohorts at all time points, when adjusted for preoperative differences. Forgotten joint scores were significantly different with the noncemented group scoring lower (56.6 [±28.2] vs. 44.3 [±31.7], P = 0.013) and fewer patients met the threshold for forgetting their joint (75.3% vs. 51%, P = 0.002). Complications and readmissions were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that noncemented TKA patients experience greater early postoperative pain and are more likely to be aware of their prosthesis than cemented TKA patients. Morphine Milligram Equivalent utilization for noncemented TKA patients was also markedly higher. Future studies should examine how to best define success for noncemented TKAs.