JAAOS - 2026-05-15 - Journal Article
Effect of Start Time, Intraoperative Shift Change, and Case Order on Outcomes After Cervical Spinal Fusion.
Dalton J, Oris RJ, Ezeonu T, Huang R, Narayanan R, Martinazzi BJ, DiCiurcio WT, Lee Y, Bradley E, Siddiqui H, Swiderski T, LaBarbiera A, Micou L, Woods BI, Kurd MF, Rihn JA, Kaye ID, Canseco J, Hilibrand A, Vaccaro A, Schroeder G, Kepler C
Topics
Key Takeaway
Intraoperative nursing shift change independently predicted 2.04 days longer LOS and 53% lower odds of home discharge after cervical spinal fusion.
Summary Depth
Choose how much analysis to show on this article page.
Summary
This study evaluated whether OR workflow variables—start time, intraoperative shift change, and case order—independently affect postoperative outcomes in 463 adults undergoing primary cervical fusion in 2020–2021. On multivariable regression controlling for age, BMI, comorbidities, levels fused, and procedure time, intraoperative shift change predicted 2.04 days longer LOS (P<0.001) and OR 0.47 for home discharge (P=0.030). Second-or-later case order independently predicted 1.62 days longer LOS (P=0.002) but paradoxically lower odds of 1-year revision surgery (OR 0.41, P=0.018).
Key Limitation
The paradoxical finding that non-first-case surgery predicts lower 1-year revision rates is unexplained and likely reflects unmeasured case-selection bias rather than a true protective effect of later scheduling.
Original Abstract
INTRODUCTION
With increasing orthopaedic surgical demand, the importance of operating room (OR) efficiency and safety is paramount. However, there is a lack of research regarding the effect of OR and staff workflow factors on postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of OR workflow on outcomes after elective cervical fusion, with a focus on inpatient complications and discharge disposition.
METHODS
Adult patients who underwent primary cervical fusion (2020 to 2021) were retrospectively identified. OR workflow variables included (1) OR arrival before versus after 12 pm , (2) intraoperative shift change, and (3) case order. Outcomes included time to physical therapy, length of stay (LOS), inpatient complications, 90-day emergency department visits/readmissions, and 1-year revision surgery.
RESULTS
Four hundred sixty-three patients were included. Afternoon patients experienced more cardiopulmonary complications ( P = 0.043) and longer LOS ( P = 0.020). Intraoperative shift change was associated with longer and more commonly posterior surgery with more levels fused/decompressed (all P values < 0.05). Multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that an intraoperative shift change (estimate: 2.04, P < 0.001) and second or later case (estimate: 1.62, P = 0.002) were independently predictive of longer LOS when controlling for age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, number of levels fused/decompressed, procedure time, time from OR to first physical therapy session, and inpatient complications. An intraoperative shift change was predictive of decreased home discharge (odds ratio: 0.47, P = 0.030). Non-first-case surgery was associated with lower odds of 1-year revision surgery (odds ratio: 0.41, P = 0.018).
CONCLUSION
In a cohort of patients with similar demographics and comorbidities, intraoperative shift changes independently predicted increased LOS (2.04 days longer) and nonhome discharge, and second-case or later case order independently predicted LOS (1.62 days longer). However, second-case or later case order independently predicted lower odds of 1-year spine revision surgery. Additional work is needed to evaluate the potential reasons for these findings.